top of page

Arsene Wenger's Push for Offside Rule Overhaul: What's at Stake?




Arsene Wenger, FIFA's chief of global football development, is pushing for a radical change to the offside rule, which could potentially give attackers a significant advantage on the field.


According to The Times, Wenger is "convinced" that his proposal works, following successful trials in Italy, Sweden, and the Netherlands.


His proposal suggests that there must be "daylight" between the attacker and defender for an offside offence to occur. If any part of the attacker's body, from which they can score, is in line with the last defender, then this is considered onside. Wenger intends to present his proposal to the International FA Board (IFAB) and is hopeful for swift adoption.





However, despite the potential benefits, there are concerns that Wenger's proposal may give too much advantage to attackers, according to the report. Luis Figo, head of UEFA's Football Board, is reportedly against the proposal, suggesting that further trials may be necessary in competitions using VAR before any changes are made to the law.


David Dein, former Arsenal and FA vice-president, has expressed support for Wenger's idea, describing it as "refreshingly innovative" during a FIFA Congress in Bangkok. Wenger himself has been working on this proposal for four years, emphasising the need for a change in the offside rule to eliminate contentious decisions based on millimetres.


Steve Halls, founder of NexxtGen Football, shares his perspective on Wenger's proposal, stating, "Wenger's proposal represents a significant shift in how we perceive offside offences. By focusing on 'daylight' between attackers and defenders, it could simplify the decision-making process for referees and reduce the controversy surrounding offside calls. However, we must also consider the potential impact on the game's dynamics and fairness. Any changes should undergo thorough testing and evaluation before implementation."


While Premier League clubs are set to see changes to offside decisions next season with the introduction of semi-automated technology, any further alterations to the offside rule will require IFAB approval. Wenger's proposal marks a potential turning point in football's rulebook, but its adoption hinges on careful consideration and consensus among football's governing bodies.





The Evolution of Football Rules: Ifab's Sin-Bin Trial and Blue Cards Explained




Football's governing body, Ifab, is set to embark on a trial introducing sin-binning players and the issuance of blue cards, a move poised to reshape the dynamics of the game. The announcement, expected later today, marks a significant step in exploring the potential expansion of sin-bins, traditionally used for dissent at grassroots levels, to now include cynical fouls.


The essence of the trial revolves around a player receiving a blue card from the referee and subsequently spending 10 minutes in the technical area. However, crucial details, such as the commencement date and the specific competitions involved, remain undisclosed.


The Premier League has opted out of the initial trial rollout, stating its reluctance to participate. Similarly, Fifa, football's world governing body, refuted claims of implementing the so-called 'blue card' at elite levels, deeming them premature. Fifa emphasised the need for any trials to be conducted responsibly at lower levels, intending to reinforce this stance during the Ifab AGM scheduled for March 1.


Ifab, the International Football Association Board, will convene its annual meeting at Loch Lomond in Scotland in March. The agenda includes discussions about sin-bin trials at higher levels of the game, signifying a potential paradigm shift in football regulations.


The concept of sin-bins was initially piloted in the 2018-19 season, demonstrating a commendable 38% reduction in dissent across 31 leagues, according to the Football Association. Subsequently, these measures were introduced across all levels of grassroots football starting from the 2019-20 season, with the aim of fostering respect and fair play.


The rule change extended to step five of the National League system and tier three and below in women's football. "I believe there is frustration for fans watching games when they see a promising counter-attack that's ruined by that [a tactical foul]," expressed Mark Bullingham, the FA chief executive. He added, "The question of whether a yellow card is sufficient for that has led to us looking at whether that should be involved in the protocol as well."


As football evolves, so do its rules, and the Ifab sin-bin trial signifies a proactive approach to addressing nuances in player behavior, dissent, and tactical fouls. The outcome of this trial could potentially reshape the future landscape of football regulations and the way the beautiful game is played and officiated.


Best wishes.




bottom of page