top of page



Arsene Wenger, FIFA's chief of global football development, is pushing for a radical change to the offside rule, which could potentially give attackers a significant advantage on the field.


According to The Times, Wenger is "convinced" that his proposal works, following successful trials in Italy, Sweden, and the Netherlands.


His proposal suggests that there must be "daylight" between the attacker and defender for an offside offence to occur. If any part of the attacker's body, from which they can score, is in line with the last defender, then this is considered onside. Wenger intends to present his proposal to the International FA Board (IFAB) and is hopeful for swift adoption.





However, despite the potential benefits, there are concerns that Wenger's proposal may give too much advantage to attackers, according to the report. Luis Figo, head of UEFA's Football Board, is reportedly against the proposal, suggesting that further trials may be necessary in competitions using VAR before any changes are made to the law.


David Dein, former Arsenal and FA vice-president, has expressed support for Wenger's idea, describing it as "refreshingly innovative" during a FIFA Congress in Bangkok. Wenger himself has been working on this proposal for four years, emphasising the need for a change in the offside rule to eliminate contentious decisions based on millimetres.


Steve Halls, founder of NexxtGen Football, shares his perspective on Wenger's proposal, stating, "Wenger's proposal represents a significant shift in how we perceive offside offences. By focusing on 'daylight' between attackers and defenders, it could simplify the decision-making process for referees and reduce the controversy surrounding offside calls. However, we must also consider the potential impact on the game's dynamics and fairness. Any changes should undergo thorough testing and evaluation before implementation."


While Premier League clubs are set to see changes to offside decisions next season with the introduction of semi-automated technology, any further alterations to the offside rule will require IFAB approval. Wenger's proposal marks a potential turning point in football's rulebook, but its adoption hinges on careful consideration and consensus among football's governing bodies.








In the dynamic world of football, where the pursuit of success often aligns with financial prowess, Financial Fair Play (FFP) emerges as a regulatory beacon aiming to foster stability, fairness, and sustainability. This comprehensive article delves into the intricacies of FFP, exploring its origins, overseers, sanctioned clubs, and the consequential punishments meted out.


Understanding Financial Fair Play: A Primer


Financial Fair Play, introduced by the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) in 2010, seeks to curb excessive spending by football clubs, promoting financial stability and preventing clubs from succumbing to financial crises. The primary objective is to ensure clubs operate within their means, discouraging unsustainable financial practices that could jeopardize the long-term health of the sport.


Who Oversees Financial Fair Play?


UEFA, the governing body for European football, is the driving force behind Financial Fair Play regulations. UEFA's Club Financial Control Body (CFCB) monitors and enforces FFP, overseeing compliance and investigating potential breaches.


Notable Cases of Sanctioned Clubs: A Walk Through FFP History


Over the years, several prominent clubs have faced the consequences of breaching FFP regulations. Here are a few noteworthy cases:


1. Manchester City: The Pioneering Case


In 2014, Manchester City faced sanctions for breaching FFP rules, with UEFA imposing a €60 million fine and limiting the club's Champions League squad size. This marked a significant precedent, illustrating the severity of penalties for non-compliance.


2. AC Milan: A Fall from Grace


AC Milan, an Italian football giant, encountered FFP troubles that led to exclusion from UEFA competitions for the 2018-2019 season. The club faced financial instability, triggering concerns about their ability to meet FFP requirements.


3. Paris Saint-Germain: Balancing the Books


French powerhouse Paris Saint-Germain faced scrutiny for their financial dealings, leading to a settlement agreement with UEFA in 2019. The club committed to significant financial adjustments to align with FFP guidelines.


4. Galatasaray: Navigating the FFP Maze


Galatasaray, the Turkish football stalwart, found themselves in the FFP crosshairs. UEFA intervened, imposing fines and squad limitations to ensure compliance with financial regulations.


Punishments for Breaching FFP: Striking a Balance


FFP breaches trigger a spectrum of punishments, with UEFA employing measures designed to foster corrective action without crippling the affected clubs. Sanctions may include fines, squad size limitations for UEFA competitions, transfer market restrictions, and, in extreme cases, exclusion from UEFA competitions.


Challenges and Criticisms Surrounding FFP


While FFP aims to instill financial responsibility, it has faced criticism and challenges. Critics argue that FFP disproportionately favors established clubs, inhibiting the ability of ambitious, financially backed newcomers to compete at the highest levels.


Navigating the Future of FFP


As Financial Fair Play continues to shape the financial landscape of football, clubs must tread cautiously to avoid falling afoul of regulations. UEFA's commitment to enforcing FFP underscores its importance in maintaining the integrity and sustainability of the beautiful game. The evolving nature of FFP and its impact on the footballing world will undoubtedly be a storyline worth monitoring in the years to come.


In the intricate dance between financial prowess and footballing glory, Financial Fair Play serves as a regulatory guardian, ensuring a level playing field for clubs and safeguarding the sport's long-term viability. ⚽💼


Best wishes,





bottom of page